Here is a good Q&A from the NASA website on the Mayan Doomsday phenomena.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
Here is a good Q&A from the NASA website on the Mayan Doomsday phenomena.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
The flaming sword at the east of the garden of Eden has intrigued men for centuries. What was it? Where is it now? Here is the scripture quotation describing it:
[Gen 3:24 KJV] “So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”
There is very little information regarding this sword on the internet. The Hebrew reads חֶרֶב לַהַט or lahat chereb for flaming sword as translated into English by the KJV. The translation of lahat according to Brown-Driver-Briggs is flame, devour, or magic as in hidden. The flaming sword is not visible to our eyes.
Where did the sword go? It is still in the hands of one of Gabriel’s angels. Gabriel is the leading angel in the rank known as Cherubim according to Rabbi, Torah scholar, and Jewish philosopher Moshe ben Maimon, (also known as Maimonides) who wrote the order of hierarchy in his book “Mishneh Torah”. According to this source, Cherubim were known for helping people deal with the effects of sin in this world. God’s Cherubim or angels guard the path to the tree of life according to the account in Genesis.
Jesus will open the path to the tree of life in the last days, allowing us to pass into the New Jerusalem as long as we remain faithful and true to the Truth found only in following Christ.
[Rev 22:14 KJV] “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.”
Some Jewish rabbis correlate the natural birth experience with the ejection from the Garden of Eden. The knowledge of eternal life being guarded by Angelic beings, or Spiritual enlightenment.
What I see is that we have been denied knowledge of the eternality of the soul unless we believe completely in Jesus Christ. As we bind our spirit with His Spirit, we are made alive again in the Spirit world by having God “quicken” our Spirit, or rather breathe life into these dry bones again and raise us spiritually from the dead. This is what we find in Revelation.
The leaves of the Tree of Life give healing again, and according to Rev 22:14 quoted above, that same tree is accessible at the end of this age by following “his commandments” which mean the commandments Jesus (aka God) gives us in His Word.
The tree is still there, the angels are still there, and the spiritual sword still guards that path whom we know as the Word. The Word is the sword of the Spirit that divides asunder.
[Heb 4:12 KJV] “For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.”
I have frequently had the question of whether the sons of god, daughters of men found in Genesis chapter 6 were speaking of angels having sex with human females. Here is what I infer from Genesis 6:1-5.
1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. 3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years. 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. 5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Before we get into the interpretation of Genesis 6, let us look at the various uses of the phrases ’sons of God’ and ‘daughters of men’ in scripture.
Uses of the phrase ‘Sons of God’ in scripture.
Gen 6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Job 1:6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
Job 2:1 Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.
Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
Joh 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
Rom 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.
Phi 2:15 That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;
1Jo 3:1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
1Jo 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
Uses of the phrase ‘Daughters of men’ in scripture
Gen 6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
The fruit of that union; “and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.”
Mighty men- Gibbo’r | gibbo’r pronounced: ghib-bore’, ghib-bore’
Intensive from the same as H1397; powerful; by implication warrior, tyrant: – champion, chief, X excel, giant, man, mighty (man, one), strong (man), valiant man.
Renown-
Shem
pronounced: shame
A primitive word (perhaps rather from H7760 through the idea of definite and conspicuous position; compare H8064); an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication honor, authority, character: – + base, [in-] fame [-ous], name (-d), renown, report.
The offspring of the union of the Sons of God and the Daughters of men were apparently strong warriors or tyrants as well as men of renown and report. I would say sons of God would reference the original line of Seth starting with Enos. And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD. So with the starting of Enos we have men calling upon the name of the Lord, ie seeking the will of God.
Then came on down the line Enoch.
Gen 5:24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.
Enoch had a special relationship with God.
Heb 11:5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
Enoch’s great-great-grandson was Noah, a preacher of righteousness.
Gen 5:29 And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD hath cursed.
So with the arming of all this information we can deduct through further analysis of Genesis chapter 6 that if you mingle righteousness (Lineage of Seth) with unrighteousness (Lineage of Cain) you will have pride and arrogance which is what I believe ‘mighty men’ and ‘men of renown’ mean. I take this from the context of the passage. We see these children, mighty men, fall into sin which makes God abhor them. If not pride and arrogance then something equally sinful in nature; at least nothing righteous because in the following verses after Genesis 6:1-4 we have our righteous judge (the Spirit of God) proclaiming judgement and salvation through the flood.
Sidebar! It is also interesting to note that when Cain was excommunicated from his household, he was kicked out eastward. He was placed in the land of Nod which being rendered literally means wandering. (Brown-Driver-Briggs) Eastward is a type and shadow of Sin (Tabernacle door eastward). The priest would enter from the east, walk west into the Holy of Holies face back eastward where the people awaited and sprinkle the redemption blood eastward. To compare this with today’s doctrines of men (unrighteousness) and doctrine’s of God (righteousness) is not an unfair comparison. Kind of like neither hot nor cold. Laodicea springs to mind.
Other evidence supporting this is the context of the previous chapters. Chapter 6 deals with the judgment of God on the unrighteous and sinful union of ’sons of God’ and ‘daughters of men’. As I’ve previously noted, the union did not produce giants, but rather during the time when giants walked on the earth, men of renoun were born to the aforementioned union. The fifth chapter of Genesis deals with the righteous lineage of Seth. The fourth chapter is all about the unrighteous line of Cain.
So, in context we have Cain+Seth=men of renoun which turned into pride and sin which God repented of and would have completely obliterated if not for Enoch’s righteous great grand son, Noah… a preacher of righteousness.
Most who propose the angels coming down to have sex with men will use extra biblical passages, such as the following pericope from the book of Enoch:
1. And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. 2. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: ‘Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.’ 3. And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: ‘I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.’ 4. And they all answered
Book of Enoch Chapter 6
I believe we should use scripture to interpret scripture. because of this belief, I do not hold much stock in psuedopigraphical works such as the Book of Enoch. Hopefully I have answered most of your questions if you have ever wondered about this.
Angelic hosts occupy the same plane of existence that demons do. There are no differing universes or planes of existence for angels than demons. Ephesians 6:12 states:
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
The Greek word for “high places” is epouranios, which means above the sky, celestial, or heavenly places. Sometimes we as Apostolic Pentecostals tend to think that devils and angels exsist is seperate spiritual planes of exsistance and come to duke it out at times on terra firma. This is not so. There is a spiritual plane of exsistance where the bible states that both angels and demons exsist together as the war in heaven continues.
So, what about angels. What kinds and types of angels exsist? Well, the bible lists several different ‘kinds’ of angels. This order is taken from an exhaustive work by Psuedo-Dionysius entitled De Coelesti Hierarchia. Psuedo-Dionysius completed this work in the 5th century. The Christian hiearchy differs from the Jewish heirarchy.
The Jewish hiearchy is:
| Rank | Angel | Notes |
| 1 | Chayot Ha Kodesh | |
| 2 | Ophanim | |
| 3 | Erelim | See Isaiah 33:7 |
| 4 | Hashmallim | See Ezekiel 1:4 |
| 5 | Seraphim | See Isaiah 6 |
| 6 | Malakhim | Messengers, angels |
| 7 | Elohim | “Godly beings” |
| 8 | Bene Elohim | “Sons of Godly beings” |
| 9 | Cherubim | See Talmud Hagigah 13b |
| 10 | Ishim | “manlike beings”, see Daniel (10:5) |
The Christian hiearchy is as follows, and the one I will focus the rest of the article on.
Seraphim (Fiery Ones): [1]
Seraphim, literally “burning ones”, is the plural of “seraph”, more properly sarap. The word sarap/seraphim appears three times in the Torah (Numbers 21:6-8, Deuteronomy 8:15) and four times in the Book of Isaiah (6:2-6, 14:29, 30:6). In Numbers and Deuteronomy the “seraphim” are serpents – the association of serpents as “burning ones” is possibly due to the burning sensation of the poison. Isaiah also uses the word in close association with words to describes snakes (nahash, the generic word for snakes, in 14:29, and efeh, viper, in 30:6). Isaiah’s vision of seraphim in the First Temple in Jerusalem is the sole instance in the Hebrew Bible of the word being used to describe celestial beings: there the winged “seraphim” attend God and have human attributes: “… I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and His train filled the Hekhal (sanctuary). Above him stood the Seraphim; each had six wings; with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew.” (Isaiah 6:1–3) In Isaiah’s vision the seraphim cry continually to each other, “Holy, holy, holy, is YHWH of hosts: the whole earth is full of His glory” (verses 2-3) before carrying out an act of purification for the prophet (verses 6-7). It is possible that these are winged snake-beings, but given that the word “seraphim” is not attached as an adjective or modifier to other snake-words (“nahash,” etc.), as is the case in every other occurrence of the word, it is more probable that they are variants of the “fiery” lesser deities making up God’s divine court. “Seraphim” appear in the 2nd century B.C. Book of Enoch where they are designated as drakones (δράκονες “serpents”), and are mentioned, in conjunction with the cherubim as the heavenly creatures standing nearest to the throne of God. In the late 1st century A.D. Book of Revelation (iv. 4-8) they are described as being forever in God’s presence and praising Him constantly: “Day and night with out ceasing they sing: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was and is and is to come.’” They appear also in the Christian Gnostic text On the Origin of the World, described as “dragon-shaped angels”.
Cherubim (Mighty Ones): [2]
The term cherubim is cognate with the Assyrian term karabu, Akkadian term kuribu, and Babylonian term karabu; the Assyrian term means ‘great, mighty’, but the Akkadian and Babylonian cognates mean ‘propitious, blessed’. In some regions the Assyro-Babylonian term came to refer in particular to spirits which served the gods, in particular to the shedu (human-headed winged bulls); the Assyrians sometimes referred to these as kirubu, a term grammatically related to karabu. They were originally a version of the shedu, protective deities sometimes found as pairs of colossal statues either side of objects to be protected, such as doorways. However, although the shedu were popular in Mesopotamia, archaeological remains from the Levant suggest that they were quite rare in the immediate vicinity of the Israelites. The related Lammasu (human-headed winged lions — to which the sphinx is similar in appearance), on the other hand, were the most popular winged-creature in Phoenician art, and so most scholars suspect that Cherubim were originally a form of Lammasu. In particular, in a scene reminiscent of Ezekiel’s dream, the Megiddo Ivories — ivory carvings found at Megiddo (which became a major Israelite city) — depict an unknown king being carried on his throne by hybrid winged-creatures.
A pair of shedu, protecting a doorway (the body of the creatures extending into the distance) The Lammasu was originally depicted as having a king’s head, a lion’s body, and an eagle’s wings, but due to the artistic beauty of the wings, these rapidly became the most prominent part in imagery ; wings later came to be bestowed on men, thus forming the stereotypical image of an angel. The griffin — a similar creature but with an eagle’s head rather than that of a king — has also been proposed as an origin, arising in Israelite culture as a result of Hittite usage of griffins (rather than being depicted as aggressive beasts, Hittite depictions show them seated calmly, as if guarding), and some have proposed that griffin may be cognate to cherubim, but Lammasu were significantly more important in Levantine culture, and thus more likely to be the origin. Early Semitic tradition conceived the cherubim as guardians, being devoid of human feelings, and holding a duty both to represent the gods and to guard sanctuaries from intruders, in a comparable way to an account found on Tablet 9 of the inscriptions found at Nimrud. In this view, cherubim, like the shedu, were probably originally depictions of storm deities, especially the storm winds. This view is offered as a hypothesis to explain the reason for cherubim being described as acting as the chariot of Yahweh in Ezekiel’s dream, the Books of Samuel, the parallel passages in the later Book of Chronicles, and passages in the early Psalms: “and he rode upon a cherub and did fly: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind”.
Ophanim (Thrones / Wheels): [3]
An Ophan (Lat. ophan[us], pl. ophani[m] from Hebrew אְוּפַּנים) is one of a class of celestial beings called Ophanim described in the Book of Enoch with the Cherubim and Seraphim as never sleeping, but watching (or guarding) the throne of God. The word ophan means “wheel” in Hebrew so the Ophanim have been associated with the description in Ezekiel 1:15-21 and possibly again in the Daniel 7:9 (mentioned as gagal, traditionally “the wheels of gagallin”, in “fiery flame” and “burning fire”) of the four, eye-covered wheels (each composed of two nested wheels), that move next to the winged Cherubim, beneath the throne of God. The four wheels move with the Cherubim because the spirit of the Cherubim is in them. These are also referred to as the “many-eyed ones” in the Second Book of Enoch. The Ophanim are also equated as the “Thrones”, associated with the “Wheels”, in the vision of Daniel 7:9 (Old Testament). They are the carriers of the throne of God, hence the name. However, they may or may not be the same Thrones (Gr. thronos) mentioned by Paul of Tarsus in Colossians 1:16 (New Testament).
Rulers (Dominions): [4]
The “Dominions” (lat. dominatio, plural dominationes, also translated from the Greek term kyriotites as “Lordships”) are presented as the hierarchy of celestial beings “Lordships” in the De Coelesti Hierarchia. The Dominions, also known as the Hashmallim, regulate the duties of lower angels. It is only with extreme rarity that the angelic lords make themselves physically known to humans. They are also the angels who preside over nations. The Dominions are believed to look like divinely beautiful humans with a pair of feathered wings, much like the common representation of angels, but they may be distinguished from other groups by wielding orbs of light fastened to the heads of their scepters or on the pommel of their swords.
Virtues (Strongholds): [5]
The “Virtues” or “Strongholds” lie beyond the ophanim (Thrones/Wheels). Their primary duty is to supervise the movements of the heavenly bodies in order to ensure that the cosmos remains in order. The term appears to be linked to the attribute “might”, from the Greek root “δύναμις” in Ephesians 1:21, which is also translated as “Virtue”. They are presented as the celestial Choir “Virtues”, in the Summa Theologica. Traditional theological conceptions of the Virtues might appear to describe the same Order called the Thrones (Gr. thronos), (in which case the Ophanim may not be the same thing as “Thrones”). From Dionysius the Areopagite: “The name of the holy Virtues signifies a certain powerful and unshakable virility welling forth into all their Godlike energies; not being weak and feeble for any reception of the divine Illuminations granted to it; mounting upwards in fullness of power to an assimilation with God; never falling away from the Divine Life through its own weakness, but ascending unwaveringly to the superessential Virtue which is the Source of virtue: fashioning itself, as far as it may, in virtue; perfectly turned towards the Source of virtue, and flowing forth providentially to those below it, abundantly filling them with virtue.”
Powers (Authorities): [6]
The “Powers” (lat. potestas, pl. potestates), or “Authorities”, from the Greek exousies, (see Greek root in Eph 3:10) appear to collaborate, in power and authority, with the Principalities (Rulers). The Powers are the bearers of conscience and the keepers of history. They are also the warrior angels created to be completely loyal to God. Some believe that no Power has ever fallen from grace, but another theory states that Satan was the Chief of the Powers before he Fell (see also Ephesians 6:12). Their duty is to oversee the distribution of power among humankind, hence their name. Paul used the term rule and authority in Ephesians 1:21, and rulers and authorities in Ephesians 3:10. He may have been referring to the rulers and authorities of humanity, instead of referring to angels.
Principalities (Rulers): [7]
The “Principalities” (lat. principatus, pl. principatūs) also translated as “Princedoms” and “Rulers”, from the Greek arche (see Greek root in Eph 3:10), appear to collaborate, in power and authority with the Powers (Authorities). The Principalities are shown wearing a crown and carrying a sceptre. Their duty also is said to be to carry out the orders given to them by the Dominions and bequeath blessings to the material world. Their task is to oversee groups of people. They are the educators and guardians of the realm of earth. Like beings related to the world of the germinal ideas, they are said to inspire living things to many things such as art or science. Paul used the term rule and authority in Ephesians 1:21 , and rulers and authorities in Ephesians 3:10 . He may have been referring to the rulers and authorities of men or societies, instead of referring to angels.
Arch Angels: [8]
The Hebrew Bible uses the terms מלאכי אלוהים (malakhi Elohim; Angels of God), “The Hebrew word for angel is “malach,” which means messenger, for the angels are God’s messengers to perform various missions.” מלאכ י י (malakhi Adonai; Angels of the Lord), בני אלוהים (b’nai elohim; sons of God) and הקדושים (ha-qodeshim; the holy ones) to refer to beings traditionally interpreted as angelic messengers. Other terms are used in later texts, such as העליונים (ha-elyonim, the upper ones, or the Ultimate ones). Indeed, angels are uncommon except in later works like Daniel, though they are mentioned briefly in the stories of Jacob (who, according to several interpretations, wrestled with an angel) and Lot (who was warned by angels of the impending destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah). Daniel is the first biblical figure to refer to individual angels by name. It is therefore widely speculated that Jewish interest in angels developed during the Babylonian captivity. According to Rabbi Simeon ben Lakish of Tiberias (230–270 AD), all the specific names for the angels were brought back by the Jews from Babylon.
Guardian Angels (Angels): [9]
Early Christians inherited Jewish understandings of angels, which in turn may have been partly inherited from the Egyptians. In the early stage, the Christian concept of an angel characterized the angel as a messenger of God. Angels are creatures of good, spirits of love, and messengers of the savior Jesus Christ. Later came identification of individual angelic messengers: Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, Uriel, and Lucifer. Then, in the space of little more than two centuries (from the third to the fifth) the image of angels took on definite characteristics both in theology and in art. By the late fourth century, the Church Fathers agreed that there were different categories of angels, with appropriate missions and activities assigned to them. Some theologians had proposed that Jesus was not divine but on the level of immaterial beings subordinate to the trinity. The resolution of this trinitarian dispute included the development of doctrine about angels. (author’s comment: Obviously if your willing to have God divided into three persons, it begs the question of why not more than three. This was debated for quite a while as they tried to get the trinitarian theology ironed out to fit the scriptures. On a side note, I’ve altered the original text from Wikipedia to change references to the trinity to be a lowercase t as I don’t believe the trinity to be a divine or holy doctrine.) The angels are represented throughout the Christian Bible as a body of spiritual beings intermediate between God and men: “You have made him (man) a little less than the angels…” (Psalms 8:4-5). Some Christians believe that angels are created beings, and use the following passage as evidence: “praise ye Him, all His angels: praise ye Him, all His hosts… for He spoke and they were made. He commanded and they were created…” (Psalms 148:2-5; Colossians 1:16). The Fourth Lateran Council (1215) declared that the angels were created beings. The Council’s decree Firmiter credimus (issued against the Albigenses) declared both that angels were created and that men were created after them. The First Vatican Council (1869) repeated this declaration in Dei Filius, the “Dogmatic constitution on the Catholic faith”. Of note is that the Bible describes the function of angels as “messengers” and does not indicate when the creation of angels occurred.
Many Christians regard angels as asexual and not belonging to either gender as they interpret Matthew 22:30 in this way. Angels are on the other hand usually described as looking like male human beings. Their names are also masculine. And although angels have greater knowledge than men, they are not omniscient, as Matthew 24:36 points out. Another view is that angels are sent into this world for testing, in the form of humans.
A list of some famous angels and their associations are as follows:
This list above and more information concerning angels can be found at The Jewish Encyclopedia. A lot concerning angelology is taken from Jewish talmud and Kabbalistic writings (13th century), so use with caution when researching this on your own. Please note that the Bible should be our final authority when examining any spiritual thing.
[1] Taken from Wikipedia article on Seraphim, accessed March 16, 2011.
[2] Taken from Wikipedia article on Cherubim, accessed March 16, 2011.
[3] Taken from Wikipedia article on Ophan, accessed March 16, 2011.
[4] Taken from Wikipedia article on Christian Angelic Hiearchy, accessed March 16, 2011.
[5] Taken from Wikipedia article on Christian Angelic Hiearchy, accessed March 16, 2011.
[6] Taken from Wikipedia article on Christian Angelic Hiearchy, accessed March 16, 2011.
[7] Taken from Wikipedia article on Christian Angelic Hiearchy, accessed March 16, 2011.
[8] Taken from Wikipedia article on Archangels, accessed March 16, 2011.
[9] Taken from Wikipedia article on Seraphim, accessed March 16, 2011.